Qualitative Research in Curriculum

Comparative study of the Ph.D. courses in sport management in Iran and selected countries

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

seyed mohamad hosein hoseini ravesh 1
hosein peymani zad, 2
hasan fahim devin 2
reza ismaeel zadeh 2

1 Sports Management, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran

2 physical education, sports management , Islamic Azad Univercity ,Mashad, iran

https://doi.org/10.22054/qric.2023.60670.324
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to study the study courses of the Ph.D. Iran Sport Management (based on the latest review of 1393) and compare it with selected countries (America, Canada) to learn the content of the course syllabus in order to achieve fit, consistency and achievements. The research method is based on the nature of the subject, a qualitative comparative-comparative type that consists of four stages of George Brady: 1. Description 2. Interpretation 3. Neighborhood 4. Includes comparison. The target population is selective and covers both the United States and Canada. Sampling with the degree of importance and progress of the universities of the studied countries has been studied. In the United States, the University of Applied Sciences, Ph.D. in Sport Management, received from the North American Sports Management Association (NASSM) include: Troy, Louisiana, Oregon, Michigan, Ohio, Minnesota, New Mexico, North Carolina, Indiana, Kansas, Illinois, Florida, and Canada have universities in Brooklyn, Ottawa, Waterloo, Western, Alberta, Virginia. The research tool has been used to collect information from the library, which is based on the results.The findings of this study indicate that in the universities of the United States and Canada, compared to the University of Iran, the curriculum components of the community are more intrinsic to the depth of research and applied.Continuous review and enhancement of flexibility for updating and utilizing the course syllabus and special attention to the quantitative and qualitative research topic

Keywords

course syllabus
Ph.D
Sport Management
Selected Universities
- Akker, J.H Vanden. (2013). Curriculum persective: An Introduction. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
- Anderson,T(2022).An updated and theoretical rational for interaction (it forum paper No.63) AthAbasca university.
- Aliye, E. (2019). Comparing the language Curriculum of Turkey and Irland procedia- social and behavioral sciences volume 1//issue 1 pages 529-535.
- Becket, N & Brooks (2018), quality management in higher education: what quality are we actually enhancing, Journal of hospitality, Leisure, sport & tourism education, VOL, 7.NO.I
- Barrent,E(2015). Conceptualizing curriculum chang,univercity of london institute or educational teaching in higher education,Vol.6.No4
- Burton,J.L &MCDonal. S(2021).curriculum or syllabus witch are we reforming?Medical teacher Vol.23No.2,pp.187-191.
- Calvin, N & John, N. (2013). An Examination of Sport Managent Doctoral Pogramme Research Requirements.Educate ~ Vol. 13, No. 2, 2013, p. 24-35. http://www.educatejournal.org.
- Chao- ching, yu-fen, C and Kai-wen,C. (2014).a study on comparing the objective model in curriculum planning between Taiwan and American.Tainan technology univercity /tainan Taiwan, National changhua univercity of education / changhua, Taiwan and National Kaohsiung Hospitalality college/ Kaohsuing Taiwan.
- Gregor, s, janko,s. (2022). Influence of the quality implimentation of a physical education curriculum on the physical development and physical fitness of children BMC public Health, 12,61.
- Marsh, C(2014).Key concepts for understanding curriculum.Publish by patledge falmer, Taylor and Francies group. London and Newyork.
- Nunan, D(2020).Syllabus Design,Oxford:Oxford
- Petrina, S(2021). Curriculum and instruction for technology teachers, in press Programs in special education joint doctoral program. http://www.sfsu.edu/-spedcd/joint-htmt
- Scott,Petter. (2019), UK Higher education in twenty first century; a changing picture, quality matters series, London, QAA.
- Soner, Raymond & Li chia, Yiu (2021), ISO 10015 quality standard for training, a much needed instrument to improve performance of in-service-training,Geneva:CSEND.
Qualitative Research in Curriculum
Volume 4, Issue 12
Autumn 2023
Pages 116-138

Home

Submit Manuscript

Reviewers

Contact Us