Qualitative Research in Curriculum

Current Issue

By Issue

By Author

By Subject

Author Index

Keyword Index

About Journal

Aims and Scope

Editorial Board

Publication Ethics

Indexing and Abstracting

Related Links

FAQ

Peer Review Process

Metrics

News

Article Writing Guide

Files

The presentation of the l curriculum pattern for social studies based on the social constructivist theory

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 university of tehran

2 Faculty / Tehran University

Abstract

The purpose of designing and validating research was the optimal model of social studies curriculum of the first high school according to the constructivist approach. The method is descriptive and analytical. In order to identify the optimal model through studying and studying the theoretical foundations of social studies and also obtaining a picture of the current situation, it was tried to use a specialist view, as well as a review of resources and specialized studies, to illustrate the desirable situation of drawing In this stage, using targeted sampling using documents, as well as through an interview with 12 experts in social planning and curriculum planning, the identification of elements Social studies education provided the ideal model for the first level secondary education curriculum. The results of this study suggest that the nine elements of the curriculum are to be found in the three areas of constructive psychological foundations, in accordance with the lesson of social science education, the field of sociology of social science education and the philosophical field corresponding to the curriculum of constructive social science education Oriented approach and, finally, with elements and constructivist approach, the cycle of learning process results in four stages

Keywords

References
Ahmad, C. N. C. Ching, W. C. Yahaya, A. & Abdullah, M. F. N. L. (2015). Relationship between Constructivist Learning Environments and Educational Facility in Science Classrooms. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 1952-1957.
Ahmad, S. Sultana, N. & Jamil, S. (2020). Behaviorism vs constructivism: A paradigm shift from traditional to alternative assessment techniques. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 7(2), 19-33.
Bergen, P. & Parsell, M. (2019). Comparing radical, social and psychological constructivism in Australian higher education: a psycho-philosophical perspective. In Australian Educational Researcher, 46(1). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-018-0285-8
Bermejo V, Ester P and Morales I (2021) A Constructivist Intervention Program for the Improvement of Mathematical Performance Based on Empiric Developmental Results (PEIM). Front. Psychol. 11:582805. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.582805
Booyse, C. & Chetty, R. (2016). The significance of constructivist classroom practice in national curricular design. Africa Education Review, 13(1), 135-149.
Frusci, J. (2019). Applying reacting to the past to develop and enhance critical and analytical thinking skills of postsecondary history/social studies students (Doctoral dissertation, Northeastern University).
Gurses, A. Dogar, C. & Gunes, K. (2015). A New Approach for Learning: Interactive Direct Teaching Based Constructivist Learning (IDTBCL). Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 2384-2389.
 Gutek, G. L. (2005). Historical and philosophical foundation of education. 4th Edition. Pearson Publication.
Hartle, R. T. Baviskar, S. & Smith, R. (2012). A Field Guide to Constructivism in the College Science Classroom: Four Essential Criteria and a Guide to Their Usage. Bioscene: Journal of College Biology Teaching, 38(2), 31-35.
Jančič, P. & Hus, V. (2019). Representation of teaching strategies based on constructivism in social studies. International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 25(1), 64-77.
Kaya, A. & Dönmez, B. (2009). An evaluation of the classroom management approaches of the class teachers implementing “Constructivist Learning Approach”. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 575-583.
Kondracki, N. L. Wellman, N. S. & Amundson, D. R. (2002). Content analysis: review of methods and their applications in nutrition education. Journal of nutrition education and behavior, 34(4), 224-230
Kwan, Y. W. & Wong, A. F. (2015). Effects of the constructivist learning environment on students’ critical thinking ability: Cognitive and motivational variables as mediators. International Journal of Educational Research, 70, 68-79.
Lee, S. S. & Fraser, B. J. (2001). High School Science Classroom Learning Environments in Korea
Martin, N. (2019). From containment to realpolitik and back again: A realist constructivist analysis of Turkey–EU relations and the migration Issue. Journal of Common Market Studies, 57(6), 1349-1365. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12947
Maxim, G.W. (2010) Dynamic Social Studies for Constructivist Classrooms, Pearson Education, Inc. Boston.
Merve, K. A. R. A. (2019). A systematic literature review: Constructivism in multidisciplinary learning environments. International Journal of Academic Research in Education, 4(1-2), 19-26.
Mohammed, S. H., & Kinyó, L. (2020). The role of constructivism in the enhancement of social studies education. Journal of critical reviews, 7(7), 249-256.
O’Connor, K. (2022). Constructivism, curriculum and the knowledge question: tensions and challenges for higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 47(2), 412-422.
Özerbaş, M. A. (2015). Evaluation of New Primary Education Curriculum Based on Constructivist Learning Approach through the Viewpoints of Teachers. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 2292-2300.
Riedener, S. (2019). Constructivism about intertheoretic comparisons. Utilitas, 31(3), 277-290. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953820819000165
Savas, B., Senemoglu, N., & Kocabas, A. (2012). The effects of integrated unit and constructivist based teaching learning process on fourth grades students’ learning levels, attitudes towards learning, academic self-confident. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 2811-2815.
Shah, R. K. (2019). Effective constructivist teaching learning in the classroom. Shah, RK (2019). Effective Constructivist Teaching Learning in the Classroom. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 7(4), 1-13.
Simons, P. R. J. (1993). Constructive learning: The role of the learner. In Designing environments for constructive learning (pp. 291-313). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Slavin, R. E. (2019). Educational psychology: Theory and practice.
Struyven, K., Dochy, F., Janssens, S., & Gielen, S. (2006). On the dynamics of students' approaches to learning: The effects of the teaching/learning environment. Learning and Instruction, 16(4), 279-294.
Zais, Robert S (1986). Curriculum: Principles and Foundations. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell Co
Zielinski, D. E. (2017). The use of collaboration, authentic learning, linking material to personal knowledge, and technology in the constructivist classroom: Interviews with community college faculty members. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 41(10), 668-686. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2016.1220338.
Qualitative Research in Curriculum
Volume 4, Issue 12
November 2023
Pages 62-85
Files
Share
How to cite
Statistics