Analyzing and Explaining Assessment and Value Strategies in the First Secondary Curriculum

Khedri, Hosein; Bayani, Ali Asghar; Fakuri Haji Yar, Hosein; Saemi, Hasan

doi:10.22054/qric.2023.65793.345

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

¹ PhD student in Curriculum Planning, Department of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Azadshahr Branch, Azadshahr, Iran

² Associate Professor, Department of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Azadshahr Branch, Azadshahr, Iran.

³ Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Azadshahr Branch, Azadshahr, Iran

⁴ Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Azadshahr Branch, Azadshahr, Iran.

https://doi.org/10.22054/qric.2023.65793.345

Abstract

The aim of the present study is to analyze and explain the assessment and evaluation strategies in the first secondary school curriculum. The research approach is qualitative with a conventional content analysis method. The study population was key experts in the evaluation and valuation of Golestan province who participated in the research through semi-structured interviews using property-based sampling method. The aim of the present study is to analyze and explain the assessment and evaluation strategies in the first secondary school curriculum. The research approach is qualitative with a conventional content analysis method. The study population was key experts in measuring and valuing Golestan province who, using criterion-based snowball sampling method, 20 data saturation individuals participated in the study through semi-structured interviews. Data were analyzed using MAXQDA coding method and software in three steps of discovering concepts, subcategories and main categories. Based on the findings, assessment and valuation strategies in the junior high school curriculum are classified into four main categories: hierarchical, inclusive, specialist-oriented, and mixed. A hierarchy based on purpose and action-oriented, inclusive, need-based, expert-centered, as well as mixed, can be considered as participatory and multidimensional. The findings indicate that the first intermediate course of our country faces a great challenge in the field of assessment and evaluation in the curriculum. Therefore, it will be possible to solve it with the correct application of assessment and valuation strategies in the curriculum of this course by teachers by holding training workshops.

Keywords

References

Andersson, C. & Palm, T. (2018). Reasons for Teachers’ Successful Development of a Formative Assessment Practice Through Professional Development – a Motivation Perspective. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 25(6), 576-597.

Black, P. & Wiliam, D. (2018). Assessment for Learning in the Classroom. Assessment and Learning, 11-32.

Bell, C.A. White, R. S. & White, M. E. (2018).A System’s View of California’s Teacher Education Pipeline.Getting Down to Factts Old Dominion University:1-90.

Carrillo-de-la-Peña, M. T. & Pérez, J. (2011). Continuous Assessment Improved Academic Achievement and Satisfaction of Psychology Students in Spain. Teaching of Psychology, 39(1), 45-47.

Carless, D. (2009). Trust, distrust and their impact on assessment reform. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(1), 79-89.

Eseryel, D. (2002).Approaches to Evaluation of Training: Theory & Practic. Educational Technology & Society 5(2),93-98.

Elstad, E. Lejonberg, E. & Christophersen, K. (2015). Mentor education: challenging mentors’ beliefs about mentoring. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 4(2), 142-158.

Hopfenbeck, T. N. (2020). Making feedback effective? Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 27(1), 1-5.

Hashimov, E. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook and The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. Technical Communication Quarterly, 24(1), 109-112.

Jessop, T. & Tomas, C. (2016). The Implications of Programme Assessment Patterns for Student Learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(6), 990-999.

Landers, J.D. (2018). Traditional Versus Nontraditional Instructional and Assessment Differences in 8th-Grade HistorySocial Science Achievement. Walden University. Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies,1-96.

Tian, H. & Sun, Z. (2018). Metrology Basis of Academic Achievement Survey. Academic Achievement Assessment, 249-264.

Tezer, M. & Ozrecberoglu, N. (2015). Students’ View of the Problems Faced with the Measurement and Evaluation System in the Primary School Mathematics Education System. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 186, 856-861.

Veldhuis, M. Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. Vermeulen, J. A. & Eggen, T. J. (2014). Teachers' Use of Classroom Assessment in Primary School Mathematics Education in the Netherlands. CADMO, (2), 35.

Whitworth, B. A, & Chiu, J. L. (2014). Professional development and teacher change: the missing leadership link, Science teacher education.

‌

‌‌استناد به این مقاله: خدری، حسین.، اصغربیانی، علی.، فکوری حاجی یار، حسین.، صائمی، حسن. (1401). واکاوی و تبیین استراتژی‌های سنجش و ارزش‌یابی در برنامه درسی متوسطه اوّل، فصلنامه‌ پژوهش‌های کیفی در برنامه‌ریزی درسی، 4(11)، 35-64.

DOI: 10

Qualitative Research in Curriculum is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License..

Analyzing and Explaining Assessment and Value Strategies in the First Secondary Curriculum

References

References

Volume 4, Issue 11July 2023Pages 34-56

Volume 4, Issue 11
July 2023
Pages 34-56