Document Type : Research Paper
Authors
1 PhD in Industrial Engineering / Sharif University of Technology
2 Bone and Joint Surgery (Orthopedics) Professor, Iran University of Medical Sciences Medical ethics teacher
Abstract
Value engineering is one of the most successful problem solving approaches, reducing costs and improving performance and quality. Continuous improvement of the quality of education is the ultimate goal of the country's educational evaluation. In this regard, internal evaluation makes it possible to judge the quality and achieve the goals of the education system. In the years after the Islamic Revolution, attention to the quality of education, especially in education, has become more important than ever.
This research was applied in terms of purpose and quasi-experimental in terms of method. Fifty female high school students who studied in the first half of the 1400-99 academic year, in this type of sampling of 50 students by drawing lots of two classes of 25 people in a class as a control group and One class was selected as the experimental group. In this study, the two main indicators of the impact of value engineering and quality of secondary education in two groups with one pre-test and two post-tests were examined.
The results show that there is a significant difference between the value engineering strategy in applying the maximum ideas and creativity of teachers and school staff as well as parents and students between the two control and experimental groups. Therefore, with the results of pre-test and post-test in two groups, it can be said that the value engineering strategy is effective in using the maximum ideas and creativity of teachers and school staff, as well as parents and students.
Keywords
Cooper & Slagmulder, Robin & Regine.(1997). Target costing and value Engineering, Productiviting press, the LMA(institute or mamgagement Accountants) Foundation for Applied Research, Inc. (ISBN: 1-S6327-127- 9)
Kaufman j. jerry, value management.(1998) Creating competitive Advantage crisp publication, (ISBN: 1-56052-484-7)
Baker. Mery, (1999), Training Effectiveness Assessment, Naval Air Warfare center Training
System Devision.
Chapman. R & Wilson.p, (2005), Total Quality Training and Human Resource Development, Dogan page.
Checkland, P. (1999). System thinking, systems practice, Chichester:John Welley & Sons, LTD.
Chua C. (2004) Perception of Quality in Higher Education. Australlia: AUQA Occasional Publication; 1-3.
Ivancevich.John.M, (2001), Human Resource Management,Eight Edition, Mcgrawhill companies.
Henry, T. (2001), Creating a place where people want to be. Middle Ground, 3, 10-16
Kosar, J. & Ahmad, F. (2000), Building security into schools. The School Administrator, 57(2), 24-26.
Massy, f. William. (2006). assessing education quality measures and processes center for
development of teaching and learning vol 6, no 3 available.
Salomon, G. (1996). Studying Novel learning environments as patterns of change. In S. Vosniadou,
- International perspectives on the design of technology supported learning environments,
Mahwah, NJ: Lawerence Erbaum Associates.
Wiencke, W. & Sloep, P. (2000). The virtual reality learning spacesfor students with special needs,
In J. Bourdeau & Heller, Proceedings of EdMedia (2000). (pp.1142-1146). Chariottesville, USA: AACE.
)