Negotiation Curriculum, Requirements, Opportunities and Challenges

Sharafi, Sakineh; Momeni Mahmoui, Hossein

doi:10.22054/qric.2023.57764.311

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

¹ Mashad zone 7, education department

² Associate Professor , Azad University of Torbat Heydaries, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22054/qric.2023.57764.311

Abstract

In the philosophy of education, there is no more important perspective than its emphasis on the learner’s participation in the formation of educational goals. Curricula play an important role in the success or failure of achieving to these goals of educational systems. This article has been prepared with the aim of explaining the negotiation curriculum and while stating the principles and foundations of the negotiation curriculum, examines the opportunities and challenges arising from the design and implementation of this type of curriculum. The nature of this research is practical in terms of purpose. The data were collected based on a qualitative research project of synthesis type. The research process has been done in 6 consecutive steps. According to the gained results of the study, the implementation of a negotiation curriculum is necessary to meet the new needs of communities. Curriculum negotiation can improve interaction and achieve some important emotional goals.

Keywords

References

Boomer, Garth, N. Lester, C. Onore & J. Coo (1992). Negotiating the Curriculum: Educating for the 21^st Century. (pp 4-13). London: Falmer.

Bovill, C. (2013) Students and staff co-creating curricula: a new trend or an old idea we never got around to implementing? In: Rust, C. (ed.) Improving Student Learning Through Research and Scholarship: 20 Years of ISL. Series: Improving student learning (20). Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development: Oxford, UK, pp. 96-108. ISBN 9781873576922

Bovill, C. (2020). Co-creation in learning and teaching: the case for a whole-class approach in higher education. High Education, 79, 1023–1037. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00453

Bovill, C. and Bulley, C.J. (2011) A model of active student participation in curriculum design: exploring desirability and possibility. In: Rust, C. (ed.) Improving Student Learning (ISL) 18: Global Theories and Local Practices: Institutional, Disciplinary and Cultural Variations. Series: Improving Student Learning (18). Oxford Brookes University: Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development: Oxford, pp. 176-188. ISBN 9781873576809

Bovill, Catherine, Cook‐Sather, Alison, Felten, Peter, (2011), Students as co‐creators of teaching approaches, course design, and curricula: implications for academic developers, International Journal for Academic Development, Vol 16, No 2, Pp 133-145, DOI: 10.1080/1360144X.2011.568690

Bovill, C. Woolmer, C. (2019). How conceptualizations of curriculum in higher education influence student-staff co-creation in and of the curriculum. High Education 78, 407–422 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0349-8

Bovill, Catherine; Woolmer, Cherie, (2019), Higher Education: The International Journal of Higher Education Research, Vol 78, No 3, Pp407-422 Sep 2019

Bron, Jeroen, Bovill, Catherine, Veugelers, Wiel, (2016), Students experiencing and developing democratic citizenship through curriculum negotiation: the relevance of Garth Boomer's approach, Curriculum Perspectives, 36 (1) September 2016.

Bron, J. Bovill, C. and Veugelers, W. (2016) Curriculum negotiation: the relevance of Boomer's approach to the curriculum as a process, integrating student voice and developing democratic citizenship. Curriculum Perspectives, 36(1), pp. 15-27

Bron, Jeroen, Bovill, Catherine, Veugelers, Wiel, (2018), Distributed curriculum leadership: How negotiation between student and teacher improves the curriculum, Journal of Ethical Educational Leadership Special Issue, March 2018, 74-95.

Gómez, Paola Andrea; Cortés-Jaramillo, Julio Andrés, (2019). Constructing Sense of Community through Community Inquiry and the Implementation of a Negotiated Syllabus, GIST Education and Learning Research Journal, No 18, p68-85, Jan-Jun 2019.

Grossman,Pam, Pupik Dean, Christopher G. (2019), Teaching and Teacher Education, Volume 80, April 2019, Pages 157-16.

Guadalupe, Tasha, Curtner-Smith, Matthew D. (2020), ‘It’s nice to have choices:' influence of purposefully negotiating the curriculum on the students in one mixed-gender middle school class and their teacher, Sport, Education and Society Volume 25, 2020 - Issue 8,

Jagersma, John, (2010), Empowering Students as Active Participants in Curriculum Design and Implementation, New Zealand Journal of Teachers' Work. Dec2011, Vol. 8 Issue 2, p114-121. 8p.

Lubicz-Nawrocka, Tanya Michelle, (2019), Creativity in Student Engagement: Special Edition, Vol 2, No 3, (2019).

Lubicz-Nawrocka, Tanya Michelle, (2020), Exploration of how curriculum co-creation advances student and staff aims for Scottish higher education, Edinburgh Research Archive, The University of Edinburgh, 2019.

McCrory Calarco, Jessica, (2018), Negotiating Opportunities: How the Middle Class Secures Advantages in School, New York: Oxford University Press, 2018, Pp. vii+248.

Mutendwahothe W. Lumadi (2019) Curriculum Reform in Disadvantaged Communities: A Critical Pedagogy, Africa Education Review, 16:6, 1-3, DOI: 10.1080/18146627.2019.1679475

Van der Laan, Annette, Bron, Jeroen, (2018), The curriculum negotiation method, SLO, Netherlands Institute for Curriculum Development, 2018.

‌

‌‌استناد به این مقاله: شرفی، سکینه.، مؤمنی، مهمویی حسین . (1401). برنامه درسی مذاکرهای، الزامات، فرصتها و چالش‌ها، فصلنامه‌ پژوهش‌های کیفی در برنامه‌ریزی درسی، 4(11)، 161-200.

DOI: 10

Qualitative Research in Curriculum is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License..

Negotiation Curriculum, Requirements, Opportunities and Challenges

References

References

Bovill, C. (2020). Co-creation in learning and teaching: the case for a whole-class approach in higher education. High Education, 79, 1023–1037. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00453

Bron, J. Bovill, C. and Veugelers, W. (2016) Curriculum negotiation: the relevance of Boomer's approach to the curriculum as a process, integrating student voice and developing democratic citizenship. Curriculum Perspectives, 36(1), pp. 15-27

Bron, Jeroen, Bovill, Catherine, Veugelers, Wiel, (2018), Distributed curriculum leadership: How negotiation between student and teacher improves the curriculum, Journal of Ethical Educational Leadership Special Issue, March 2018, 74-95.

Volume 4, Issue 11July 2023Pages 132-165

Volume 4, Issue 11
July 2023
Pages 132-165