دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی

Number of Issues

23

Article View

201,906

PDF Download

175,328

View Per Article

1518.09

PDF Download Per Article

1318.26

Number of Submissions

509

Rejected Submissions

260

Reject Rate

51

Accepted Submissions

131

Acceptance Rate

26

Time to Accept (Days)

425

Number of Indexing Databases

4

Number of Reviewers

185

A Comparative Study of Upper Secondary Curriculum Structures in Iran, Finland, Germany, and England: Reorganizing Curriculum toward a Comprehensive Diploma in Iran

https://doi.org/10.22054/qric.2026.95517.507

Mohammad Hossein Iravani, Mahboobe Arefi, Fathi Vajargah Kourosh, Gholamreza Shams

Abstract How upper secondary education is organized shapes the duration of common learning, the point at which specialization begins, and students’ ability to combine or reconsider their choices. This study compares the curriculum structures of Iran, Finland, Germany, and England and identifies design principles for reorganizing Iran’s general upper secondary curriculum toward a comprehensive diploma. A qualitative comparative multiple-case design was used, drawing on Bereday’s four stages of description, interpretation, juxtaposition, and comparison, alongside document and framework analysis. The cases were selected purposively to represent contrasting arrangements of centralization, specialization, and student choice. The corpus included 23 current official curriculum, regulatory, assessment, and certification documents available up to July 2026. Four configurations emerged: a centralized fixed-stream structure in Iran, a modular-integrative structure in Finland, a domain-balanced course structure in Germany, and a qualification-selective structure in England. Key differences concerned the common curriculum, timing of specialization, pathway permeability, local authority, guidance, and the relationship between school learning and external certification. On this basis, a core-concentration-choice framework is proposed for Iran, combining a sustained common curriculum, gradual concentration, guided electives, bridge modules, continuous guidance, interdisciplinary work, and multi-source assessment. A comprehensive diploma, the comparison suggests, need not eliminate specialization; it should make common learning, focused study, and revisable choice work together more effectively.

Review and Critique of "Teachers as Transformatory Intellectuals" Theory in Henry Giroux's View point

Volume 1, Issue 4, Spring 2016, Pages 100-120

https://doi.org/10.22054/qric.2016.7483

Ehsan Ekradi

Abstract Henry Giroux considers teachers as transformative intellectuals and believes that teachers possess their own political and ethical roles and have obligatory attempt to materialize radical democracy within and without classroom. They should criticize the purposes, content, approaches and technologies of teaching. Also, they should criticize curriculum knowledge, and discover it’s underneath interests and ideologies. Giroux claims that teachers are one of the resistance resources against reproduction of the dominant system (hegemony) in education, and they can criticize their hegemony by means of breaking borders of dominant curriculum. Teachers should be possessed of enriched cultural studies, too, and study cultural differences and draw attention to them in classroom. They should make opportunities for all of the students so that they can communicate their own culture and history in classroom, and ultimately, by this way they can connect teaching up to their lives and culture. Teachers as common intellectuals, should be committed to establishing social justice and resistance against unequal relations of power, and they should endeavor accompanied by other agents and critics.

Establishing and Accreditating High Schools Curriculum Quality Assessment Criteria and Indicators: A Case Study

Volume 1, Issue 2, Spring 2016, Pages 107-144

https://doi.org/10.22054/qric.2016.1872

ali keshavarz zadeh, Mohsen Farmahini Farahani

Abstract The aim of this study was to develop criteria and indicators for curriculum quality assessment of Iran’s high schools. In this regard, the most important and fundamental criteria and indicators of curriculum assessment were collected and then the data was investigated by accreditation experts. The aim of this study is applicable and data collection method is descriptive due to the study nature. The study statistical community included 300 line and staff experts of Kohkiluye & Boyer Ahmad’s education office and quality assessment specialists of universities. Researcher made questionnaire used as research tool. Descriptive methods and single sample t test was used to data analysis.The findings show that all of criteria and indicators were assessed in high desirable level, and by t test calculation about every criteria and indicators with specified degree of freedom (sig=0.000) value is less than the allowed error (0.05), they are important and acceptable criteria and indicators.

Teacher Leadership in the Implementation of the Curriculum: Challenges and Opportunities

Volume 1, Issue 3, Summer 2016, Pages 53-81

https://doi.org/10.22054/qric.2016.7069

Hassan Maleki, Babak Salmani, Abbas Abbaspour, Rezvan Hakimzadeh, Mohammad Hassan Amir Teimouri

Abstract For many years the debate was about the role of the teacher in the implementation of curriculum of the various aspects in educational management issues, supervision and guidance, and emphasized teacher’s role in the teacher guides. However, according to the teacher's role in the "teacher leadership" with a focus on the implementation of the curriculum in the research literature within the subject was ignored and unknown. This study has dealt with analyze the leadership of teachers in the curriculum of the features, advantages and disadvantages of it. The current study was administrated through application of descriptive-analytic method. The findings suggested that there was a relationship between teacher leadership and distributed leadership in school and leadership in the school can be distributed among teachers that the subject be followed effectiveness of teachers in implementing the curriculum. Finally, the study concluded that teacher leadership is possible and requirement and possibilities for complete success in this role depends on more researches, appropriate conditions in schools and their teachers.

Review of social reconstruction theory

Volume 1, Issue 1, Winter 2016, Pages 81-100

https://doi.org/10.22054/qric.2015.1850

Abstract The purpose of this article is a critique of the theory of social reconstruction program. The theory for the fundamental changes the whole curriculum, and teacher and student curriculum as the main actors, play a crucial role in social reform. The method used in this research is descriptive - analytical and to obtain valid data of "document review" interest is taken. A total of four main question for this study based on their design and research process is formed. Therefore, the process is also first explained the origin and cause theories of social reconstruction, then its main propositions extracted and then introduced the pioneers of this theory, explain its implications for the curriculum. Babadsty documents on the one hand and providing a review and evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of Western scholars view them from the perspective of the next section of the article is formed. In the end, we tried to provide a fairly comprehensive discussion of the possibility of such an approach in the formal education curriculum with Iran to be paid more attention. Results showed that the operation of those statements that comply with the reformist vision of social reconstruction of the country's documents, can create movement in the design of the curriculum. But should the extreme view of this theory, especially the decentralization plan, the centrality of the role of teachers and students in the school and induction exaggeration avoided creating fundamental changes in society.

Contingency management track the effectiveness of decentralization of curriculum

Volume 1, Issue 1, Winter 2016, Pages 21-40

https://doi.org/10.22054/qric.2015.1846

mohsen nobakht pour

Abstract One of the major issues of education and decentralization in education is the focus of the world; Look static to the current curriculum of the efficiency and effectiveness of education is not necessary. The aim of this study is to provide a model with a dynamic look and taking into account the environmental requirements for cross curriculum centralization and decentralization in the way of an effective way. In this model of centralization and decentralization per se is not considered good or bad, but that appropriate environmental requirements or inappropriate degree of decentralization measures. Qualitative research and data collected is through observation, interview and library study. In this discussion of the models offered by Izadi and Mehr Mohammadi discussed, The proposed model known as contingency management to track the effectiveness of the curriculum offered. The model for a dynamic look to decentralize curriculum have used charts track the effectiveness of aid, So that the degree of centralization and decentralization as a continuum in the x-axis and y-axis placed on the environment. Then consider the environmental requirements specified degree of centralization and decentralization, In general, given the characteristics of both the effectiveness of the system curriculum must travel to reach your goals, suggested.

analysis of curriculum Theory with an emphasis on an a criticsm about Eisner's and McNiell's

Volume 1, Issue 1, Winter 2016, Pages 1-20

https://doi.org/10.22054/qric.2015.1845

saeed mazbouhi, mohsen hajitabar, saeed shafiei

Abstract The issue of curriculum ideologies is one of the major and fundamental issues in the field of curriculum. A brief review of the theoretical background of curriculum ideologies over the past decades reveals that a great concern has been addressed to this subject resulting in different classifications and literatures. Eisner and Mac Neil, based on their precious work, are two well-known curriculum scholars deeply interested in curriculum ideologies - related issue. The present paper aims to undertake in-depth study of Eisner’s and Mac Neil’s thoughts in that particular area in order to reflect the different interpretations of curriculum ideologies and give the logical justifications for these understandings. After having reviewed Eisner’s and Mac Neil’s ideas, the researcher made an attempt to introduce key elements of their thoughts mainly through careful consideration to curriculum ideologies. Finally, the findings of the study were analyzed by comparing Eisner’s with Mac Neil’s ideas and some conclusions, as a result, were drawn. Generally speaking, the comparison of the results showed that there were fundamental differences between Eisner’s and Mac Neil’s ideologies and philosophies although they shared some similarities.

A Comparison between the Document of Islamic Republic of Iran’s National Curriculum and the part of Curriculum in the Theoretical Basis of Fundamental Development of Public- Formal Education System of Islamic Republic of Iran

Volume 2, Issue 5, Spring 2016, Pages 107-141

https://doi.org/10.22054/qric.2018.17073.109

Nader Salsabili

Abstract Abstract
In this research the purpose has been focused on the review and comparison of the National Curriculum Document of Islamic Republic of Iran regard the criteria extracted from Sub-System of Curriculum in the Theoretical Basis of Fundamental Development of Public- Formal Education System of Islamic Republic of Iran Document. The research goal has been recognition of differences and contradictions between these two documents and the lacks of the National Curriculum Document regard the Sub-System of Curriculum in the Theoretical Basis of Fundamental Development of Public- Formal Education System. The research method and its nature is evaluative and besides an practical inquiry. The research approach is mainly qualitative in form of deductive inference on the base of document analysis in this evaluative inquiry. The National Curriculum Document analysis and comparing it with Theoretical Basis Document, has been done on the base of the criteria extracted from it, including six related components. The related components in comparing and evaluating the National Curriculum Document are: 1-curriculum elements especially the objectives, 2-National Curriculum conceptions, 3- The necessities, backgrounds and conditions of acceptance, 4- structural and implementing characteristics, 5- attention to school based curriculum development and innovative practices, 6- attention to curriculum orientations. This evaluative inquiry and comparison has responded to the three research question.

Publication Information
Indexing and Abstracting

Keywords Cloud